Evidence Appraisal
Structured prompts for examining study design, claims, limitations, transparency, and relevance.
Critical readingResponsible research practice
Focused utilities that help researchers navigate publishing, appraise evidence, and make informed decisions—using automation as support while keeping human judgement in charge.
Available now
Six focused utilities for research decisions and working sessions. All free, none requiring an account.
Search a journal by name or ISSN for an integrity-risk profile drawn from publication growth, authorship concentration, and title warning lists.
Open tool ↗Puts Scopus quartiles, SCImago indicators, and Web of Science indexing badges directly onto your Google Scholar results.
Open tool ↗Descriptive statistics with confidence intervals, Cohen’s d and Hedges’ g effect sizes, and sample size for a two-group comparison.
Open tool ↗Puts the A*, A, B, or C rating from the ABDC Journal Quality List onto your Google Scholar results, with a tally of each tier at the top of the page.
Open tool ↗An analogue countdown whose red sector grows as the session is spent, with an independent stopwatch for timing tasks and observations.
Open tool ↗Dated tasks with due dates, priorities, and progress, held in your own browser’s storage. Nothing is transmitted and no account is possible.
Open tool ↗In development
The tools collection will grow around recurring research decisions where structured guidance can save time and improve judgement.
Structured prompts for examining study design, claims, limitations, transparency, and relevance.
Critical readingPractical support for organising screening, extraction, synthesis, and reporting decisions.
Evidence synthesisDecision support for documenting, reviewing, and communicating appropriate AI use in research.
Research practiceEvery ELT Pub tool is intended as a screening, reflection, or workflow aid. Outputs should be checked against primary sources, disciplinary standards, local context, and informed human expertise.